XMEU.L vs. JRDZ.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

XMEU.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C) and JRDZ.L (JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist)) are both Europe Equities funds - XMEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while JRDZ.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. XMEU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JRDZ.L.

Performance

XMEU.L vs. JRDZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XMEU.L

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 6.39%
• 6M: 8.32%
• 1Y: 18.45%
• 3Y*: 13.54%
• 5Y*: 10.03%
• 10Y*: 10.10%

JRDZ.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XMEU.L vs. JRDZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMEU.L

XMEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XMEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
XMEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
XMEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XMEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMEU.L vs. JRDZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMEU.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.43	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMEU.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	XMEU.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.50%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.97%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XMEU.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.37%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2,446.80%	—	—

XMEU.L vs. JRDZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JRDZ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XMEU.L vs. JRDZ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMEU.L nor JRDZ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XMEU.L or JRDZ.L?

On fees, XMEU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMEU.L or JRDZ.L?

XMEU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JRDZ.L.

What is the main difference between XMEU.L and JRDZ.L?

XMEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while JRDZ.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMEU.L and 0.25% for JRDZ.L.