PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMEU.L vs. INN1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMEU.L vs. INN1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and ING Groep NV (INN1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMEU.L is traded in GBp, while INN1.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the INN1.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMEU.L achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly lower than INN1.DE's 12.39% return. Over the past 10 years, XMEU.L has underperformed INN1.DE with an annualized return of 10.17%, while INN1.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.68% annualized return.


XMEU.L

1D
0.54%
1M
1.15%
YTD
6.81%
6M
8.75%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
10.17%

INN1.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
8.34%
YTD
12.39%
6M
18.96%
1Y
53.97%
3Y*
39.97%
5Y*
27.66%
10Y*
17.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMEU.L vs. INN1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C
6.81%25.81%3.60%13.26%-3.48%16.84%2.45%19.45%-9.45%14.83%
INN1.DE
ING Groep NV
12.34%80.25%14.45%23.93%7.57%55.23%-18.11%16.38%-35.33%26.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XMEU.L and INN1.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2007

0.49

The correlation between XMEU.L and INN1.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMEU.L vs. INN1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMEU.L
XMEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

INN1.DE
INN1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
INN1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INN1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
INN1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
INN1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
INN1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMEU.L vs. INN1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and ING Groep NV (INN1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMEU.LINN1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.28

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

10.62

-3.97

XMEU.L vs. INN1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the INN1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMEU.L and INN1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMEU.LINN1.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.29

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.96

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.55

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.14

+0.29

Drawdowns

XMEU.L vs. INN1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -44.27%, smaller than the maximum INN1.DE drawdown of -89.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMEU.L and INN1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMEU.LINN1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.27%

-89.15%

+44.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-16.39%

+6.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.16%

-18.50%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.60%

-40.17%

+24.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.55%

-69.68%

+41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-2.69%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-34.33%

+28.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

5.07%

-2.21%

Volatility

XMEU.L vs. INN1.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) is 3.78%, while ING Groep NV (INN1.DE) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that XMEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INN1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMEU.LINN1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

6.40%

-2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

18.92%

-8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

23.43%

-11.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

28.37%

-14.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

31.92%

-17.06%

Dividends

XMEU.L vs. INN1.DE - Dividend Comparison

XMEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INN1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INN1.DE
ING Groep NV
4.78%5.07%7.34%6.06%7.09%4.88%5.05%6.30%7.15%4.28%4.89%2.85%
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMEU.L and INN1.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMEU.L and INN1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer