XMEU.L vs. IEFV.L
XMEU.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C) and IEFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - XMEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while IEFV.L tracks the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMEU.L returned 10.86%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for IEFV.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMEU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IEFV.L.
Performance
XMEU.L vs. IEFV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMEU.L achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly lower than IEFV.L's 14.64% return. Over the past 10 years, XMEU.L has underperformed IEFV.L with an annualized return of 10.86%, while IEFV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
XMEU.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 23.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
IEFV.L
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 14.64%
- 6M
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 38.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
XMEU.L vs. IEFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMEU.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C | 9.34% | 25.81% | 3.60% | 13.26% | -3.48% | 16.84% | 2.45% | 19.45% | -9.44% | 14.82% |
IEFV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 14.64% | 42.20% | 5.40% | 11.41% | 1.47% | 18.58% | -3.74% | 15.71% | -12.67% | 14.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMEU.L and IEFV.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2015 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XMEU.L and IEFV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMEU.L vs. IEFV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Industrials
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Healthcare
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Technology
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Consumer Defensive
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Basic Materials
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Energy
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Utilities
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Communication Services
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Real Estate
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMEU.L vs. IEFV.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMEU.L
IEFV.L
XMEU.L vs. IEFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMEU.L | IEFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.53 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.65 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.27 | 13.42 | -5.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMEU.L vs. IEFV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, which is greater than IEFV.L's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMEU.L and IEFV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMEU.L | IEFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.42% | -34.64% | -64.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -10.57% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.15% | -15.02% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.13% | -16.16% | -9.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.78% | -34.64% | -64.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | 0.00% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.87% | -6.18% | -21.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.88% | -0.03% |
Volatility
XMEU.L vs. IEFV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) is 2.90%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that XMEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEFV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMEU.L | IEFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 3.84% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 11.09% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 13.43% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 17.10% | +6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,446.80% | 17.58% | +2,429.22% |
XMEU.L vs. IEFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IEFV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMEU.L vs. IEFV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMEU.L nor IEFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XMEU.L and IEFV.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XMEU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMEU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFV.L.
XMEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMEU.L and 0.25% for IEFV.L.
Find the right allocation for XMEU.L and IEFV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer