PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMEU.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C) and CEUR.L (Amundi MSCI Europe) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, from Xtrackers and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMEU.L returned 10.17%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for CEUR.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMEU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for CEUR.L.

Performance

XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XMEU.L having a 6.81% return and CEUR.L slightly lower at 6.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XMEU.L having a 10.17% annualized return and CEUR.L not far behind at 9.88%.

XMEU.L

1D
0.54%
1M
1.15%
YTD
6.81%
6M
8.75%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
10.17%

CEUR.L

1D
0.46%
1M
1.24%
YTD
6.66%
6M
8.99%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C		6.81%25.81%3.60%13.26%-3.48%16.84%2.45%19.45%-9.45%14.83%
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe		6.66%24.46%4.90%12.93%-5.96%17.02%2.29%19.59%-9.49%14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XMEU.L and CEUR.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.90

The correlation between XMEU.L and CEUR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XMEU.L
CEUR.L

Financial Services

23.6%
25.1%

Industrials

20.2%
19.8%

Healthcare

13.3%
13.8%

Technology

8.7%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
6.2%

Energy

5.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.8%

Utilities

4.8%
5.3%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.7%

Financial Services

XMEU.L
23.6%
CEUR.L
25.1%

Industrials

XMEU.L
20.2%
CEUR.L
19.8%

Healthcare

XMEU.L
13.3%
CEUR.L
13.8%

Technology

XMEU.L
8.7%
CEUR.L
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

XMEU.L
8.0%
CEUR.L
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XMEU.L
6.4%
CEUR.L
6.2%

Energy

XMEU.L
5.4%
CEUR.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

XMEU.L
5.0%
CEUR.L
3.8%

Utilities

XMEU.L
4.8%
CEUR.L
5.3%

Communication Services

XMEU.L
3.7%
CEUR.L
3.4%

Real Estate

XMEU.L
0.8%
CEUR.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C

Amundi MSCI Europe

Often compared with XMEU.L:
XMEU.L vs. XZEU.DEXMEU.L vs. 8PSG.DEXMEU.L vs. XMME.DEXMEU.L vs. VNRA.DEXMEU.L vs. GOVD.LXMEU.L vs. SPX4.LXMEU.L vs. EUNL.DE
Often compared with CEUR.L:
CEUR.L vs. DTLA.LCEUR.L vs. XS7R.LCEUR.L vs. XDWT.LCEUR.L vs. URTHCEUR.L vs. VERX.LCEUR.L vs. QQQCEUR.L vs. SPY

Return for Risk

XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XMEU.L
XMEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XMEU.LCEUR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.60
1.54

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.25
2.18

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.74

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

6.06

+0.59

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMEU.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XMEU.LCEUR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.54

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.68

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.66

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.56

-0.13

Drawdowns

XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -44.27%, which is greater than CEUR.L's maximum drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMEU.L and CEUR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XMEU.LCEUR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.27%

-28.63%

-15.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-11.05%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.16%

-12.66%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.60%

-17.85%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.55%

-28.63%

+0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.52%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-4.58%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.17%

-0.31%

Volatility

XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) is 3.78%, while Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that XMEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XMEU.LCEUR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.25%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

10.53%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

12.44%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

13.88%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

14.97%

-0.11%

XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XMEU.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMEU.L nor CEUR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMEU.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.98, XMEU.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XMEU.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMEU.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMEU.L and CEUR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer