XMEU.L vs. AASG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMEU.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C) and AASG.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - XMEU.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while AASG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMEU.L returned 10.17%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for AASG.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMEU.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AASG.L.

Performance

XMEU.L vs. AASG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMEU.L achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly lower than AASG.L's 30.49% return. Over the past 10 years, XMEU.L has underperformed AASG.L with an annualized return of 10.17%, while AASG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.11% annualized return.

XMEU.L

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 6.81%
• 6M: 8.75%
• 1Y: 18.92%
• 3Y*: 13.78%
• 5Y*: 10.12%
• 10Y*: 10.17%

AASG.L

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: 5.29%
• YTD: 30.49%
• 6M: 31.20%
• 1Y: 58.04%
• 3Y*: 22.95%
• 5Y*: 8.98%
• 10Y*: 12.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMEU.L vs. AASG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMEU.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C	6.81%	25.81%	3.60%	13.26%	-3.48%	16.84%	2.45%	19.45%	-9.45%	14.83%
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	30.49%	23.83%	14.04%	0.69%	-11.51%	-4.50%	24.04%	14.10%	-10.84%	30.20%

Correlation

The correlation between XMEU.L and AASG.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016	0.62

The correlation between XMEU.L and AASG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMEU.L vs. AASG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMEU.L	AASG.L
Financial Services	23.6%	14.8%
Industrials	20.2%	7.8%
Healthcare	13.3%	3.2%
Technology	8.7%	44.9%
Consumer Defensive	8.0%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	10.6%
Energy	5.4%	2.9%
Basic Materials	5.0%	3.9%
Utilities	4.8%	1.5%
Communication Services	3.7%	7.1%
Real Estate	0.8%	0.7%

Return for Risk

XMEU.L vs. AASG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMEU.L

XMEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
XMEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
XMEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 49
XMEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XMEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 42

AASG.L

AASG.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
AASG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AASG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
AASG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AASG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
AASG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMEU.L vs. AASG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMEU.L	AASG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	3.22	-1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	4.11	-1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.57	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	5.15	-3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.65	17.77	-11.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMEU.L vs. AASG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the AASG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMEU.L and AASG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMEU.L	AASG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60	3.22	-1.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.51	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.66	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.68	-0.25

Drawdowns

XMEU.L vs. AASG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -44.27%, which is greater than AASG.L's maximum drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMEU.L and AASG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMEU.L	AASG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.27%	-34.12%	-10.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.32%	-11.46%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.16%	-17.56%	+4.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.60%	-28.57%	+12.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.55%	-34.12%	+5.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-2.74%	+1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-11.02%	+5.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	3.33%	-0.47%

Volatility

XMEU.L vs. AASG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C (XMEU.L) is 3.78%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that XMEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AASG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMEU.L	AASG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	8.29%	-4.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.93%	15.55%	-5.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	18.34%	-6.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.80%	17.70%	-3.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	18.56%	-3.70%

XMEU.L vs. AASG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMEU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AASG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XMEU.L vs. AASG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMEU.L nor AASG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMEU.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMEU.L and AASG.L in my portfolio?

XMEU.L and AASG.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMEU.L or AASG.L?

On fees, XMEU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMEU.L or AASG.L?

XMEU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AASG.L.

What is the main difference between XMEU.L and AASG.L?

XMEU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while AASG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XMEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while AASG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMEU.L and 0.20% for AASG.L.