PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMEM.L vs. LCUJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMEM.L vs. LCUJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMEM.L) and Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XMEM.L is traded in GBp, while LCUJ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LCUJ.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMEM.L achieves a 25.99% return, which is significantly higher than LCUJ.DE's 16.30% return.


XMEM.L

1D
-1.54%
1M
6.19%
YTD
25.99%
6M
27.99%
1Y
53.69%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
10.73%

LCUJ.DE

1D
0.89%
1M
6.59%
YTD
16.30%
6M
15.91%
1Y
34.62%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMEM.L vs. LCUJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XMEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C
25.99%24.74%8.98%2.98%-10.70%-2.06%13.72%13.41%-9.99%
LCUJ.DE
Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc
16.30%18.57%8.63%14.20%-7.69%2.28%11.03%16.06%-4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XMEM.L and LCUJ.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMEM.L vs. LCUJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMEM.L
XMEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XMEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XMEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUJ.DE
LCUJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LCUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMEM.L vs. LCUJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMEM.L) and Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMEM.LLCUJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.35

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

3.23

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.24

10.44

+6.81

XMEM.L vs. LCUJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the LCUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMEM.L and LCUJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMEM.LLCUJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14

1.83

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.64

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.53

-0.23

Drawdowns

XMEM.L vs. LCUJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMEM.L drawdown since its inception was -54.53%, which is greater than LCUJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMEM.L and LCUJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMEM.LLCUJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.53%

-24.48%

-30.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-10.48%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

-15.07%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.94%

-18.77%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

0.00%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-5.55%

-6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

3.25%

-0.15%

Volatility

XMEM.L vs. LCUJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMEM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) at 4.10%. This indicates that XMEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMEM.LLCUJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

4.10%

+3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

14.78%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.04%

18.46%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

16.00%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

16.64%

+1.67%

XMEM.L vs. LCUJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMEM.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMEM.L vs. LCUJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMEM.L nor LCUJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMEM.L and LCUJ.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMEM.L.

XMEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LCUJ.DE is Japan Equities. XMEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while LCUJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XMEM.L and 0.12% for LCUJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMEM.L and LCUJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer