XMD.TO vs. QCN.TO
XMD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF) and QCN.TO (Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds - XMD.TO tracks the Morningstar Canada Sml GR CAD while QCN.TO tracks the Solactive Canada Broad Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMD.TO returned 16.03%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for QCN.TO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMD.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for QCN.TO.
Performance
XMD.TO vs. QCN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMD.TO achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than QCN.TO's 10.85% return.
XMD.TO
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 46.80%
- 3Y*
- 27.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
QCN.TO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 35.02%
- 3Y*
- 23.88%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- —
XMD.TO vs. QCN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF | 12.81% | 41.38% | 23.55% | 10.01% | -4.90% | 13.78% | 6.05% | 26.03% | -13.67% |
QCN.TO Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF | 10.85% | 31.83% | 21.95% | 11.28% | -5.45% | 24.65% | 5.84% | 24.53% | -10.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMD.TO and QCN.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XMD.TO and QCN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMD.TO vs. QCN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Industrials
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Energy
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Financial Services
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Real Estate
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Utilities
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Technology
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Consumer Defensive
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Communication Services
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Healthcare
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMD.TO vs. QCN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XMD.TO
QCN.TO
XMD.TO vs. QCN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMD.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.50 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 3.73 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 17.33 | -5.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMD.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.75 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 1.15 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.82 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
XMD.TO vs. QCN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMD.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.42%, which is greater than QCN.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMD.TO and QCN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMD.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.42% | -36.90% | -16.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.12% | -9.43% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | -12.26% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.16% | -16.30% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -0.97% | -3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -3.65% | -4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 2.03% | +2.05% |
Volatility
XMD.TO vs. QCN.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF (QCN.TO) at 3.35%. This indicates that XMD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMD.TO | QCN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 3.35% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.26% | 10.51% | +5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.08% | 12.80% | +6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 13.24% | +3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 15.75% | +1.18% |
XMD.TO vs. QCN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMD.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QCN.TO's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMD.TO vs. QCN.TO - Dividend Comparison
XMD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than QCN.TO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCN.TO Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF | 1.96% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 3.37% | 3.26% | 2.45% | 3.02% | 3.07% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF | 0.83% | 0.97% | 1.58% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.17% | 1.91% | 2.55% | 2.44% | 1.76% | 1.97% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMD.TO and QCN.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QCN.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XMD.TO.
XMD.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Sml GR CAD, while QCN.TO tracks Solactive Canada Broad Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mackenzie. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XMD.TO and 0.04% for QCN.TO.
Find the right allocation for XMD.TO and QCN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer