XMCX.L vs. EXUS.L
XMCX.L (Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D) and EXUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD) are both exchange-traded funds - XMCX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while EXUS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XMCX.L returned 9.84% vs 23.39% for EXUS.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
XMCX.L vs. EXUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMCX.L is traded in GBp, while EXUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EXUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMCX.L achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than EXUS.L's 9.41% return.
XMCX.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
EXUS.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 23.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMCX.L vs. EXUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 3.83% | 8.84% | 5.79% |
EXUS.L Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD | 9.41% | 22.57% | 2.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMCX.L and EXUS.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XMCX.L and EXUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMCX.L vs. EXUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Financial Services
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Technology
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Real Estate
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Basic Materials
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Communication Services
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Consumer Defensive
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Healthcare
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Utilities
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Energy
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMCX.L vs. EXUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMCX.L
EXUS.L
XMCX.L vs. EXUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMCX.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.34 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 2.39 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | 8.85 | -6.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMCX.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.76 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 1.14 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
XMCX.L vs. EXUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -50.63%, which is greater than EXUS.L's maximum drawdown of -12.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMCX.L and EXUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMCX.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.63% | -12.97% | -37.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.95% | -9.70% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.13% | -0.12% | -7.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -1.76% | -9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 2.63% | +0.92% |
Volatility
XMCX.L vs. EXUS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) have volatilities of 3.58% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMCX.L | EXUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 3.75% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 11.22% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 13.17% | -0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 13.53% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 13.53% | +2.94% |
XMCX.L vs. EXUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XMCX.L and EXUS.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMCX.L vs. EXUS.L - Dividend Comparison
XMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while EXUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXUS.L Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMCX.L and EXUS.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMCX.L and EXUS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
XMCX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while EXUS.L is Global Equities. XMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while EXUS.L tracks MSCI World ex USA index.
Find the right allocation for XMCX.L and EXUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer