XMCX.L vs. DFND.AS
XMCX.L (Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D) and DFND.AS (iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMCX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while DFND.AS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMCX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DFND.AS.
Performance
XMCX.L vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMCX.L is traded in GBp, while DFND.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DFND.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
XMCX.L
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
DFND.AS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMCX.L vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 3.83% | 8.84% | 5.86% |
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMCX.L and DFND.AS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2024 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMCX.L vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank
XMCX.L
DFND.AS
XMCX.L vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D (XMCX.L) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMCX.L | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMCX.L | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | — | — |
Drawdowns
XMCX.L vs. DFND.AS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMCX.L | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.13% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | — | — |
Volatility
XMCX.L vs. DFND.AS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMCX.L | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | — | — |
XMCX.L vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMCX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMCX.L vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison
XMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while DFND.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMCX.L Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMCX.L and DFND.AS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMCX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMCX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DFND.AS.
XMCX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while DFND.AS is Industrials Equities. XMCX.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XMCX.L and 0.35% for DFND.AS.
Find the right allocation for XMCX.L and DFND.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer