XMAY vs. KAPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMAY (FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May) and KAPR (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. XMAY is actively managed, while KAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, XMAY returned 10.25% vs 22.85% for KAPR. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMAY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KAPR.

Performance

XMAY vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May (XMAY) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAY achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 10.96% return.

XMAY

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 3.39%
• 6M: 4.13%
• 1Y: 10.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KAPR

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 6M: 11.76%
• 1Y: 22.85%
• 3Y*: 13.04%
• 5Y*: 7.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAY vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XMAY FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May	3.39%	10.44%	6.33%
KAPR Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April	10.96%	7.42%	5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAY and KAPR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024	0.70

The correlation between XMAY and KAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XMAY vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAY

XMAY Risk / Return Rank: 92
XMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
XMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
XMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 94
XMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
XMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 96

KAPR

KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 95
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAY vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May (XMAY) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMAY	KAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	3.53	-0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.54	5.56	-1.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.74	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.79	9.12	-3.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	33.30	43.03	-9.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMAY vs. KAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the KAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAY and KAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMAY	KAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	3.53	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.35	0.83	+0.52

Drawdowns

XMAY vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAY drawdown since its inception was -8.24%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAY and KAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMAY	KAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.24%	-16.91%	+8.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.78%	-2.52%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.52%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-3.92%	+3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	0.53%	-0.22%

Volatility

XMAY vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May (XMAY) is 0.72%, while Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that XMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMAY	KAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.72%	2.30%	-1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.56%	4.06%	-1.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53%	6.54%	-3.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.46%	11.75%	-4.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.46%	11.63%	-4.17%

XMAY vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than KAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMAY vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMAY nor KAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMAY and KAPR in my portfolio?

XMAY and KAPR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMAY or KAPR?

KAPR has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to XMAY (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAY dropped -8.24% vs KAPR's -16.91%.

Which ETF is better, XMAY or KAPR?

On 1-year performance, KAPR leads with 22.85% vs 10.25% for XMAY. On fees, KAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMAY or KAPR?

Over the 1-year period, KAPR has performed better with a 22.85% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMAY or KAPR?

KAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMAY or KAPR?

XMAY and KAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XMAY and KAPR?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XMAY and 0.79% for KAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.