XMAW.L vs. CHRG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMAW.L (Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XMAW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMAW.L returned 12.36%/yr vs 5.81%/yr for CHRG.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMAW.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CHRG.L.

Performance

XMAW.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAW.L achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than CHRG.L's 33.50% return.

XMAW.L

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 5.65%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 6M: 12.10%
• 1Y: 30.53%
• 3Y*: 18.30%
• 5Y*: 12.36%
• 10Y*: 13.42%

CHRG.L

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 33.50%
• 6M: 30.24%
• 1Y: 105.73%
• 3Y*: 14.40%
• 5Y*: 5.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAW.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XMAW.L Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	11.58%	13.86%	20.55%	16.87%	-10.40%	20.70%	17.47%
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc	33.50%	44.29%	-11.91%	-9.67%	-19.10%	14.89%	72.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAW.L and CHRG.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020	0.66

The correlation between XMAW.L and CHRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMAW.L vs. CHRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMAW.L	CHRG.L
Technology	31.4%	8.2%
Financial Services	17.2%	-
Industrials	10.2%	48.7%
Communication Services	9.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	15.5%
Healthcare	8.7%	-
Basic Materials	3.4%	20.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	0.0%
Energy	2.7%	6.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Utilities	1.9%	1.3%

Return for Risk

XMAW.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAW.L

XMAW.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
XMAW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XMAW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XMAW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
XMAW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
XMAW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

CHRG.L

CHRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CHRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CHRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CHRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
CHRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAW.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMAW.L	CHRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	2.01	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	2.80	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.54	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	3.54	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.61	6.55	+10.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMAW.L vs. CHRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAW.L and CHRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMAW.L	CHRG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74	2.01	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	0.19	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.52	+0.33

Drawdowns

XMAW.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAW.L drawdown since its inception was -25.05%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAW.L and CHRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMAW.L	CHRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.05%	-52.64%	+27.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.37%	-29.68%	+22.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.92%	-39.46%	+20.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.92%	-52.64%	+33.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-3.57%	+3.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-22.33%	+18.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	16.07%	-14.24%

Volatility

XMAW.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L) is 3.05%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 10.23%. This indicates that XMAW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMAW.L	CHRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	10.23%	-7.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.23%	18.94%	-10.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.09%	52.29%	-41.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.40%	30.08%	-16.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.60%	29.54%	-14.94%

XMAW.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMAW.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMAW.L nor CHRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMAW.L and CHRG.L in my portfolio?

XMAW.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMAW.L or CHRG.L?

On fees, XMAW.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMAW.L or CHRG.L?

XMAW.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.

What is the main difference between XMAW.L and CHRG.L?

XMAW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CHRG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. XMAW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XMAW.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.