XMAG vs. STRN

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) and STRN (SMART Trend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index, while STRN is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by SmartWay. XMAG is passively managed, while STRN is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMAG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for STRN.

Performance

XMAG vs. STRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and SMART Trend ETF (STRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAG achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly lower than STRN's 19.31% return.

XMAG

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: 9.96%
• YTD: 12.34%
• 1Y: 20.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STRN

• 1D: -3.03%
• 1M: -6.46%
• 6M: 14.02%
• YTD: 19.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAG vs. STRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	12.34%	5.77%
STRN SMART Trend ETF	19.31%	10.48%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAG and STRN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

XMAG vs. STRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAG

XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 69
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 80

STRN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAG vs. STRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and SMART Trend ETF (STRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMAG	STRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.02	—	—

Drawdowns

XMAG vs. STRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, roughly equal to the maximum STRN drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and STRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMAG	STRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.17%	-15.43%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.78%	-8.89%	+6.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.05%	-3.00%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XMAG	STRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.82%	26.85%	-15.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.08%	26.85%	-11.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.08%	26.85%	-11.77%

XMAG vs. STRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than STRN's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMAG vs. STRN - Dividend Comparison

XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than STRN's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
STRN SMART Trend ETF	0.15%	0.18%	0.00%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	0.46%	0.51%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMAG and STRN in my portfolio?

XMAG and STRN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMAG or STRN?

On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMAG or STRN?

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for STRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMAG or STRN?

XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.15% for STRN.

What is the main difference between XMAG and STRN?

XMAG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while STRN is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and SmartWay. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMAG and 0.59% for STRN.