PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMAG vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMAG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAG achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 11.25% return.


XMAG

1D
0.01%
1M
6.69%
YTD
12.73%
6M
13.28%
1Y
24.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
12.73%15.63%-1.67%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAG and ITOT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024

0.89

The correlation between XMAG and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMAG vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMAG
ITOT

Technology

25.3%
33.8%

Financial Services

17.3%
12.1%

Healthcare

13.0%
9.0%

Industrials

12.6%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
10.1%

Energy

5.5%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.9%
10.3%

Utilities

3.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

2.5%
2.1%

Technology

XMAG
25.3%
ITOT
33.8%

Financial Services

XMAG
17.3%
ITOT
12.1%

Healthcare

XMAG
13.0%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

XMAG
12.6%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

XMAG
7.3%
ITOT
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XMAG
6.2%
ITOT
10.1%

Energy

XMAG
5.5%
ITOT
3.7%

Communication Services

XMAG
3.9%
ITOT
10.3%

Utilities

XMAG
3.4%
ITOT
2.3%

Real Estate

XMAG
2.9%
ITOT
2.4%

Basic Materials

XMAG
2.5%
ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMAG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAG
XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMAGITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.17

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.15

14.57

+0.58

XMAG vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAG Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAG and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMAGITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.32

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.57

+0.54

Drawdowns

XMAG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMAGITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-55.20%

+39.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-8.90%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.13%

-6.97%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.94%

-0.31%

Volatility

XMAG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMAGITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.99%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

9.13%

-0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.10%

12.20%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

17.36%

-2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

18.26%

-3.14%

XMAG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMAG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
0.46%0.51%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMAG and ITOT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to XMAG (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAG dropped -16.17% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 1-year performance, ITOT leads with 28.12% vs 24.62% for XMAG. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 28.12% return vs 24.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMAG.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.46% for XMAG.

XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMAG and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMAG and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer