PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLYS.L vs. XS3R.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLYS.L vs. XS3R.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLYS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS3R.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLYS.L is traded in USD, while XS3R.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XS3R.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLYS.L achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly higher than XS3R.L's -3.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XLYS.L has outperformed XS3R.L with an annualized return of 12.84%, while XS3R.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.92% annualized return.


XLYS.L

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
-2.85%
6M
-1.92%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
12.84%

XS3R.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
-3.14%
6M
-2.07%
1Y
-7.87%
3Y*
-2.67%
5Y*
-3.75%
10Y*
1.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLYS.L vs. XS3R.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLYS.L
Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
-2.85%7.65%28.46%39.95%-33.91%28.81%26.41%28.22%0.45%22.19%
XS3R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
-3.14%11.28%-14.45%4.60%-15.52%11.97%2.49%26.30%-11.28%28.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XLYS.L and XS3R.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.39

XLYS.L vs. XS3R.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLYS.L
XS3R.L

Consumer Cyclical

98.8%
2.1%

Technology

1.0%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

97.9%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLYS.L
98.8%
XS3R.L
2.1%

Technology

XLYS.L
1.0%
XS3R.L

-

Industrials

XLYS.L
0.2%
XS3R.L

-

Basic Materials

XLYS.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Communication Services

XLYS.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XLYS.L

-

XS3R.L
97.9%

Energy

XLYS.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Financial Services

XLYS.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Healthcare

XLYS.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Real Estate

XLYS.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Utilities

XLYS.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLYS.L vs. XS3R.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLYS.L
XLYS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLYS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLYS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLYS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XLYS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLYS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XS3R.L
XS3R.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XS3R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLYS.L vs. XS3R.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLYS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS3R.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYS.LXS3R.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.93

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

-0.44

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

-0.98

+3.00

XLYS.L vs. XS3R.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLYS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the XS3R.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLYS.L and XS3R.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYS.LXS3R.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

-0.48

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

-0.23

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.12

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.48

+0.36

Drawdowns

XLYS.L vs. XS3R.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLYS.L drawdown since its inception was -37.47%, which is greater than XS3R.L's maximum drawdown of -31.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLYS.L and XS3R.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYS.LXS3R.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.47%

-31.85%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.87%

-18.03%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.13%

-22.69%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.47%

-28.89%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

-31.85%

-5.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

-19.37%

+13.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-8.32%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

8.05%

-3.31%

Volatility

XLYS.L vs. XS3R.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLYS.L) is 5.67%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS3R.L) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that XLYS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS3R.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYS.LXS3R.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

6.29%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.56%

13.29%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

16.51%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.31%

16.35%

+5.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.89%

16.03%

+4.86%

XLYS.L vs. XS3R.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLYS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XS3R.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLYS.L vs. XS3R.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLYS.L nor XS3R.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XLYS.L and XS3R.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLYS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLYS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS3R.L.

XLYS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Discretionary Index, while XS3R.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLYS.L and 0.20% for XS3R.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLYS.L and XS3R.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer