XLYP.L vs. EQQU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLYP.L (Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF) and EQQU.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLYP.L is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while EQQU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLYP.L returned 13.68%/yr vs 22.09%/yr for EQQU.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLYP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQU.L.

Performance

XLYP.L vs. EQQU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLYP.L is traded in GBp, while EQQU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQQU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLYP.L achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than EQQU.L's 19.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XLYP.L has underperformed EQQU.L with an annualized return of 13.68%, while EQQU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.09% annualized return.

XLYP.L

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: -2.69%
• 6M: -2.73%
• 1Y: 11.03%
• 3Y*: 12.55%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

EQQU.L

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 8.15%
• YTD: 19.99%
• 6M: 17.76%
• 1Y: 40.67%
• 3Y*: 24.76%
• 5Y*: 18.85%
• 10Y*: 22.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLYP.L vs. EQQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLYP.L Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF	-2.69%	0.23%	30.67%	32.31%	-26.14%	30.65%	22.15%	24.16%	6.23%	11.28%
EQQU.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	19.99%	11.22%	28.75%	48.45%	-25.54%	29.16%	43.42%	31.96%	4.16%	19.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XLYP.L and EQQU.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between XLYP.L and EQQU.L has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLYP.L vs. EQQU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLYP.L	EQQU.L
Consumer Cyclical	98.8%	11.6%
Technology	1.0%	57.9%
Industrials	0.2%	2.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.6%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

XLYP.L vs. EQQU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLYP.L

XLYP.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
XLYP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XLYP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XLYP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XLYP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 20

EQQU.L

EQQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EQQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EQQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
EQQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
EQQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLYP.L vs. EQQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLYP.L	EQQU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	2.61	-1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	3.50	-2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.46	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	3.72	-2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	10.52	-8.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLYP.L vs. EQQU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLYP.L and EQQU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLYP.L	EQQU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68	2.61	-1.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.94	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	1.10	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.99	-0.24

Drawdowns

XLYP.L vs. EQQU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLYP.L drawdown since its inception was -30.40%, which is greater than EQQU.L's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLYP.L and EQQU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLYP.L	EQQU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.40%	-27.75%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-11.12%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.52%	-24.26%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.40%	-27.75%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.40%	-27.75%	-2.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.66%	-0.73%	-5.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.54%	-5.38%	-1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.60%	3.94%	+0.66%

Volatility

XLYP.L vs. EQQU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) have volatilities of 5.00% and 4.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLYP.L	EQQU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.00%	4.92%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.81%	11.61%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.81%	15.81%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.40%	20.02%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.86%	20.15%	-0.29%

XLYP.L vs. EQQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLYP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLYP.L vs. EQQU.L - Dividend Comparison

XLYP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EQQU.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	0.23%	0.29%	0.38%	0.39%	0.56%	0.26%	0.11%
XLYP.L Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLYP.L and EQQU.L in my portfolio?

XLYP.L and EQQU.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLYP.L or EQQU.L?

On fees, XLYP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLYP.L or EQQU.L?

XLYP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQU.L.

What is the main difference between XLYP.L and EQQU.L?

XLYP.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while EQQU.L is Nasdaq-100. XLYP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while EQQU.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLYP.L and 0.30% for EQQU.L.