PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLV vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -4.29% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 9.20%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


XLV

1D
0.79%
1M
1.95%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
12.89%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
9.20%

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-4.29%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and GLD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004

0.03

The correlation between XLV and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLV vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLV
GLD

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XLV
100.0%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

XLV

-

GLD
100.0%

Communication Services

XLV

-

GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLV

-

GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

XLV

-

GLD

-

Energy

XLV

-

GLD

-

Financial Services

XLV

-

GLD

-

Industrials

XLV

-

GLD

-

Real Estate

XLV

-

GLD

-

Technology

XLV

-

GLD

-

Utilities

XLV

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLVGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.24

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.68

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

4.15

-1.16

XLV vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLVGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.21

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

1.01

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.83

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.60

-0.14

Drawdowns

XLV vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-45.56%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-19.21%

+8.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

-19.21%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-21.03%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-22.00%

-6.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-17.75%

+10.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-16.16%

+9.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

7.73%

-3.41%

Volatility

XLV vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is 4.10%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that XLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

5.51%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

23.16%

-12.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.67%

26.61%

-11.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

18.00%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

15.95%

+0.60%

XLV vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLV vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.70%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLV and GLD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to XLV (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 9.20% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

XLV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while GLD is Gold. XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.40% for GLD.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLV and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer