XLV vs. GD
XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index, while GD (General Dynamics Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLV returned 9.81%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for GD. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLV vs. GD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than GD's 7.93% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has underperformed GD with an annualized return of 9.81%, while GD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.
XLV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
GD
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 29.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 15.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
XLV vs. GD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 7.93% | 30.39% | 3.52% | 7.13% | 21.69% | 43.77% | -13.14% | 14.80% | -21.34% | 19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLV and GD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLV vs. GD — Risk / Return Rank
XLV
GD
XLV vs. GD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLV | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 2.15 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | 7.36 | -4.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLV vs. GD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum GD drawdown of -75.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and GD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLV | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | -75.67% | +36.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -14.53% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.11% | -22.55% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | -22.55% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | -51.63% | +23.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -1.49% | -2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -15.60% | +8.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 4.23% | +0.14% |
Volatility
XLV vs. GD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is 4.90%, while General Dynamics Corporation (GD) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that XLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLV | GD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 7.70% | -2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 17.78% | -7.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 21.67% | -6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 20.54% | -5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 22.76% | -6.18% |
Dividends
XLV vs. GD - Dividend Comparison
XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than GD's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 1.69% | 1.76% | 2.12% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.24% | 2.90% | 2.26% | 2.31% | 1.61% | 1.72% | 1.96% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLV and GD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GD has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to XLV (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs GD's -75.67%.
GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLV and GD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer