XLUS.L vs. SCHD
XLUS.L (Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLUS.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLUS.L returned 8.62%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLUS.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
XLUS.L vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLUS.L achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.84% return. Over the past 10 years, XLUS.L has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 8.62%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.26% annualized return.
XLUS.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 13.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- YTD
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
XLUS.L vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLUS.L Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 7.65% | 15.68% | 22.50% | -7.74% | 1.91% | 18.46% | -1.37% | 25.26% | 2.91% | 10.83% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.84% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLUS.L and SCHD is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLUS.L and SCHD has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLUS.L vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLUS.L
SCHD
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XLUS.L
SCHD
Basic Materials
XLUS.L
-
SCHD
Communication Services
XLUS.L
-
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
XLUS.L
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
XLUS.L
-
SCHD
Energy
XLUS.L
-
SCHD
Financial Services
XLUS.L
-
SCHD
Healthcare
XLUS.L
-
SCHD
Industrials
XLUS.L
-
SCHD
Real Estate
XLUS.L
-
SCHD
-
Technology
XLUS.L
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLUS.L vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
XLUS.L
SCHD
XLUS.L vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLUS.L | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.41 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 5.39 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.20 | 13.18 | -9.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLUS.L vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLUS.L drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUS.L and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLUS.L | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.30% | -33.37% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -4.61% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.43% | -16.13% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.24% | -16.85% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | -33.37% | -2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -0.71% | -2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -3.30% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 1.89% | +2.64% |
Volatility
XLUS.L vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.55%. This indicates that XLUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLUS.L | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 3.55% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 7.79% | +4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.78% | 10.98% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 14.37% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 16.70% | +1.42% |
XLUS.L vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLUS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLUS.L vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
XLUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
XLUS.L Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLUS.L and SCHD have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLUS.L.
XLUS.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. XLUS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLUS.L and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for XLUS.L and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer