XLUS.L vs. IXG
XLUS.L (Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLUS.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index, while IXG is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Financials Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLUS.L returned 8.62%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for IXG. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLUS.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXG.
Performance
XLUS.L vs. IXG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLUS.L achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than IXG's 10.44% return. Over the past 10 years, XLUS.L has underperformed IXG with an annualized return of 8.62%, while IXG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.20% annualized return.
XLUS.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 13.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
IXG
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 6.09%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 22.48%
- 3Y*
- 24.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
XLUS.L vs. IXG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLUS.L Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 7.65% | 15.68% | 22.50% | -7.74% | 1.91% | 18.46% | -1.37% | 25.26% | 2.91% | 10.83% |
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 10.44% | 28.54% | 25.69% | 14.97% | -8.97% | 25.07% | -2.99% | 24.60% | -16.33% | 23.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLUS.L and IXG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009 | 0.17 |
The correlation between XLUS.L and IXG shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLUS.L vs. IXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLUS.L
IXG
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XLUS.L
IXG
-
Basic Materials
XLUS.L
-
IXG
-
Communication Services
XLUS.L
-
IXG
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLUS.L
-
IXG
Consumer Defensive
XLUS.L
-
IXG
-
Energy
XLUS.L
-
IXG
Financial Services
XLUS.L
-
IXG
Healthcare
XLUS.L
-
IXG
Industrials
XLUS.L
-
IXG
Real Estate
XLUS.L
-
IXG
-
Technology
XLUS.L
-
IXG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLUS.L vs. IXG — Risk / Return Rank
XLUS.L
IXG
XLUS.L vs. IXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLUS.L | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.28 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.99 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.20 | 7.03 | -3.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLUS.L vs. IXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLUS.L drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum IXG drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUS.L and IXG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLUS.L | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.30% | -78.42% | +42.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -11.33% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.43% | -13.54% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.24% | -27.20% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | -43.47% | +7.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | 0.00% | -3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -19.66% | +13.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 3.20% | +1.33% |
Volatility
XLUS.L vs. IXG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) at 3.42%. This indicates that XLUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLUS.L | IXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 3.42% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 11.37% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.78% | 13.93% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 17.29% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 19.86% | -1.74% |
XLUS.L vs. IXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLUS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IXG's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLUS.L vs. IXG - Dividend Comparison
XLUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 2.15% | 2.04% | 2.64% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.69% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% |
XLUS.L Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLUS.L and IXG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLUS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXG.
XLUS.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IXG is Financials Equities. XLUS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index, while IXG tracks S&P Global Financials Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLUS.L and 0.46% for IXG.
Find the right allocation for XLUS.L and IXG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer