PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLUS.L vs. IXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLUS.L vs. IXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLUS.L achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than IXG's 10.44% return. Over the past 10 years, XLUS.L has underperformed IXG with an annualized return of 8.62%, while IXG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.20% annualized return.


XLUS.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.00%
6M
7.59%
YTD
7.65%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
8.62%

IXG

1D
1.03%
1M
6.09%
6M
10.07%
YTD
10.44%
1Y
22.48%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLUS.L vs. IXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLUS.L
Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
7.65%15.68%22.50%-7.74%1.91%18.46%-1.37%25.26%2.91%10.83%
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
10.44%28.54%25.69%14.97%-8.97%25.07%-2.99%24.60%-16.33%23.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XLUS.L and IXG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009

0.17

The correlation between XLUS.L and IXG shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLUS.L vs. IXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLUS.L
IXG

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

98.2%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.1%

Utilities

XLUS.L
100.0%
IXG

-

Basic Materials

XLUS.L

-

IXG

-

Communication Services

XLUS.L

-

IXG

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLUS.L

-

IXG
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

XLUS.L

-

IXG

-

Energy

XLUS.L

-

IXG
0.1%

Financial Services

XLUS.L

-

IXG
98.2%

Healthcare

XLUS.L

-

IXG
0.1%

Industrials

XLUS.L

-

IXG
0.2%

Real Estate

XLUS.L

-

IXG

-

Technology

XLUS.L

-

IXG
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLUS.L vs. IXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLUS.L
XLUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XLUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

IXG
IXG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLUS.L vs. IXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) and iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLUS.LIXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.28

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.99

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.20

7.03

-3.84

XLUS.L vs. IXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the IXG Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLUS.L and IXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLUS.L vs. IXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLUS.L drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum IXG drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUS.L and IXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUS.LIXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.30%

-78.42%

+42.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-11.33%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.43%

-13.54%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.24%

-27.20%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

-43.47%

+7.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.39%

0.00%

-3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-19.66%

+13.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

3.20%

+1.33%

Volatility

XLUS.L vs. IXG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) at 3.42%. This indicates that XLUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUS.LIXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.42%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

11.37%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.78%

13.93%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

17.29%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.12%

19.86%

-1.74%

XLUS.L vs. IXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLUS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IXG's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLUS.L vs. IXG - Dividend Comparison

XLUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
2.15%2.04%2.64%2.62%3.71%1.69%2.13%2.87%3.14%2.12%2.21%2.79%
XLUS.L
Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLUS.L and IXG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLUS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLUS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXG.

XLUS.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IXG is Financials Equities. XLUS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index, while IXG tracks S&P Global Financials Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLUS.L and 0.46% for IXG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLUS.L and IXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer