XLUP.L vs. SPXP.L
XLUP.L (Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLUP.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L returned 9.27%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLUP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
XLUP.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLUP.L achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 9.27%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.
XLUP.L
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
XLUP.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLUP.L Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF | 1.53% | 8.12% | 24.62% | -13.04% | 13.97% | 20.12% | -4.75% | 21.36% | 8.83% | 0.91% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLUP.L and SPXP.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.34 |
The correlation between XLUP.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLUP.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLUP.L
SPXP.L
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XLUP.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
XLUP.L
-
SPXP.L
Communication Services
XLUP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLUP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
XLUP.L
-
SPXP.L
Energy
XLUP.L
-
SPXP.L
Financial Services
XLUP.L
-
SPXP.L
Healthcare
XLUP.L
-
SPXP.L
Industrials
XLUP.L
-
SPXP.L
Real Estate
XLUP.L
-
SPXP.L
Technology
XLUP.L
-
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLUP.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLUP.L
SPXP.L
XLUP.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLUP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.52 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 4.11 | -3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 15.13 | -12.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLUP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 2.78 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 1.06 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 1.10 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.15 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
XLUP.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLUP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUP.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLUP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.94% | -25.46% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -7.09% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -20.77% | +6.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -20.77% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.94% | -25.46% | -4.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.00% | -0.21% | -8.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -3.50% | -4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 1.93% | +2.53% |
Volatility
XLUP.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that XLUP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLUP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 2.65% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 7.24% | +4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 10.49% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 14.23% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 16.22% | +2.12% |
XLUP.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLUP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLUP.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLUP.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLUP.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLUP.L.
XLUP.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. XLUP.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLUP.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for XLUP.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer