PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLSR vs. FISR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLSR vs. FISR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) and SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XLSR vs. FISR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XLSR
SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF
-7.22%17.34%17.60%18.95%-15.70%20.47%20.23%14.13%
FISR
SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF
-0.06%6.32%1.01%5.28%-15.73%-1.70%5.86%6.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLSR achieves a -7.22% return, which is significantly lower than FISR's -0.06% return.


XLSR

1D
3.23%
1M
-5.68%
YTD
-7.22%
6M
-2.89%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*

FISR

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.84%
1Y
3.49%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLSR vs. FISR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLSR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FISR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XLSR vs. FISR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLSR
XLSR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XLSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLSR Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XLSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLSR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FISR
FISR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLSR vs. FISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) and SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLSRFISRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

0.70

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

0.98

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.12

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.14

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.85

3.09

+1.77

XLSR vs. FISR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLSR Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the FISR Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLSR and FISR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLSRFISRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.70

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

-0.09

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.13

+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between XLSR and FISR is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XLSR vs. FISR - Dividend Comparison

XLSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than FISR's 4.08% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XLSR
SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF
0.60%0.58%0.66%1.04%1.80%3.44%1.25%0.94%
FISR
SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF
4.08%3.97%3.59%3.50%2.19%1.87%2.47%2.99%

Drawdowns

XLSR vs. FISR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLSR drawdown since its inception was -32.94%, which is greater than FISR's maximum drawdown of -20.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLSR and FISR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XLSRFISRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.94%

-20.27%

-12.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.20%

-3.31%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.32%

-20.10%

-3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.19%

-6.42%

-1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-7.74%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

1.22%

+1.84%

Volatility

XLSR vs. FISR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) at 1.97%. This indicates that XLSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XLSRFISRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

1.97%

+3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

3.06%

+6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.36%

5.00%

+14.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

6.57%

+10.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.21%

6.40%

+13.81%