XLRI vs. DFAR
XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and DFAR (Dimensional US Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while DFAR is a REIT fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLRI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DFAR.
Performance
XLRI vs. DFAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLRI achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly lower than DFAR's 12.82% return.
XLRI
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 4.25%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAR
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 12.82%
- 6M
- 13.22%
- 1Y
- 12.33%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI vs. DFAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 4.25% | -0.57% |
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 12.82% | -1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLRI and DFAR is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLRI vs. DFAR — Risk / Return Rank
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFAR
XLRI vs. DFAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLRI | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLRI vs. DFAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLRI drawdown since its inception was -7.12%, smaller than the maximum DFAR drawdown of -32.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLRI and DFAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLRI | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -32.27% | +25.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -3.26% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -14.07% | +12.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.69% | — |
Volatility
XLRI vs. DFAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLRI | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.90% | 13.68% | -2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 19.17% | -8.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.90% | 19.17% | -8.27% |
XLRI vs. DFAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLRI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAR's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLRI vs. DFAR - Dividend Comparison
XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, more than DFAR's 2.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 2.73% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 3.06% | 1.69% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.52% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, XLRI and DFAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, DFAR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFAR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLRI.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.52%, compared with 2.73% for DFAR.
XLRI is categorized as Derivative Income, while DFAR is REIT. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLRI and 0.19% for DFAR.
Find the right allocation for XLRI and DFAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer