XLRI vs. ACYS
XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. XLRI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
XLRI vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XLRI
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between XLRI and ACYS is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLRI vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLRI vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLRI drawdown since its inception was -7.12%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLRI and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLRI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -0.63% | -6.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -0.14% | -1.46% |
Volatility
XLRI vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLRI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 3.38% | +7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 3.38% | +7.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 3.38% | +7.87% |
XLRI vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLRI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLRI vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.56%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.56% | 6.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLRI and ACYS have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 13.56%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLRI and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for XLRI and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer