XLRE vs. GLDM
XLRE (Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - XLRE is a REIT fund tracking the Real Estate Select Sector Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLRE returned 2.86%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLRE charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.
Performance
XLRE vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLRE achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.
XLRE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
GLDM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- —
XLRE vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLRE Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund | 8.56% | 2.63% | 5.09% | 12.36% | -26.25% | 46.10% | -2.18% | 28.68% | -2.18% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 3.00% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLRE and GLDM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.14 |
XLRE vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLRE
GLDM
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
XLRE
GLDM
-
Basic Materials
XLRE
GLDM
Communication Services
XLRE
-
GLDM
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLRE
-
GLDM
-
Consumer Defensive
XLRE
-
GLDM
-
Energy
XLRE
-
GLDM
-
Financial Services
XLRE
-
GLDM
-
Healthcare
XLRE
-
GLDM
-
Industrials
XLRE
-
GLDM
-
Technology
XLRE
-
GLDM
-
Utilities
XLRE
-
GLDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLRE vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
XLRE
GLDM
XLRE vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLRE | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.25 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.70 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 4.23 | -1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLRE | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.24 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 1.04 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.02 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
XLRE vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLRE drawdown since its inception was -38.83%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLRE and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLRE | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.83% | -21.63% | -17.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -19.14% | +10.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.74% | -19.14% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.12% | -20.92% | -13.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -17.65% | +14.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -6.22% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 7.69% | -4.66% |
Volatility
XLRE vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) is 3.71%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that XLRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLRE | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 5.47% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 22.99% | -13.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.43% | 26.39% | -12.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 17.91% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 16.85% | +3.55% |
XLRE vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLRE has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLRE vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
XLRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLRE Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund | 3.22% | 3.45% | 3.43% | 3.31% | 3.70% | 2.61% | 3.15% | 3.06% | 3.78% | 3.25% | 4.22% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLRE and GLDM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to XLRE (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLRE dropped -38.83% vs GLDM's -21.63%.
On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 2.86% for XLRE. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, XLRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLRE.
XLRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.
XLRE is categorized as REIT, while GLDM is Gold. XLRE tracks Real Estate Select Sector Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLRE and 0.10% for GLDM.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLRE and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer