XLRE vs. EWT
XLRE (Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund) and EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLRE is a REIT fund tracking the Real Estate Select Sector Index, while EWT is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLRE returned 7.15%/yr vs 19.56%/yr for EWT. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLRE charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWT.
Performance
XLRE vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLRE achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 61.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XLRE has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 7.15%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.56% annualized return.
XLRE
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 6M
- 13.29%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
EWT
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 61.53%
- 6M
- 67.45%
- 1Y
- 92.18%
- 3Y*
- 34.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 19.56%
XLRE vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLRE Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.17% | 2.63% | 5.09% | 12.36% | -26.25% | 46.10% | -2.18% | 28.68% | -2.39% | 10.69% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 61.53% | 28.38% | 16.11% | 23.97% | -28.90% | 26.18% | 31.50% | 33.36% | -9.90% | 26.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLRE and EWT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2015 | 0.36 |
The correlation between XLRE and EWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLRE vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank
XLRE
EWT
XLRE vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLRE | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.55 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 8.53 | -7.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 25.15 | -21.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLRE vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLRE drawdown since its inception was -38.83%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLRE and EWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLRE | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.83% | -64.37% | +25.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -10.51% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.74% | -25.66% | +8.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.12% | -38.88% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.83% | -38.88% | +0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.19% | +4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -19.21% | +9.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.56% | -0.53% |
Volatility
XLRE vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) is 4.81%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 13.55%. This indicates that XLRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLRE | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 13.55% | -8.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 22.68% | -12.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 26.75% | -12.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 22.95% | -3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 21.78% | -1.36% |
XLRE vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLRE has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLRE vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
XLRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than EWT's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.74% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 8.12% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
XLRE Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund | 3.08% | 3.45% | 3.43% | 3.31% | 3.70% | 2.61% | 3.15% | 3.06% | 3.78% | 3.25% | 4.22% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLRE and EWT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWT has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to XLRE (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLRE dropped -38.83% vs EWT's -64.37%.
On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.56% vs 7.15% for XLRE. On fees, XLRE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.56% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLRE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.
XLRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.74% for EWT.
XLRE is categorized as REIT, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. XLRE tracks Real Estate Select Sector Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLRE and 0.59% for EWT.
EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLRE and EWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer