XLPS.L vs. EBIG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLPS.L (Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and EBIG.L (Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - XLPS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Staples Index while EBIG.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XLPS.L returned 8.35%/yr vs 17.76%/yr for EBIG.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLPS.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EBIG.L.

Performance

XLPS.L vs. EBIG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L) and Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLPS.L is traded in USD, while EBIG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EBIG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLPS.L achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than EBIG.L's -14.46% return.

XLPS.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -2.80%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 6M: 6.85%
• 1Y: 2.14%
• 3Y*: 8.35%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 7.56%

EBIG.L

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: -14.46%
• 6M: -13.70%
• 1Y: -8.52%
• 3Y*: 17.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLPS.L vs. EBIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XLPS.L Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	6.41%	3.99%	14.25%	-0.26%	-0.17%	5.44%
EBIG.L Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	-14.46%	18.24%	30.80%	31.55%	-41.58%	-36.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XLPS.L and EBIG.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.18

The correlation between XLPS.L and EBIG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XLPS.L vs. EBIG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLPS.L

XLPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
XLPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
XLPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
XLPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XLPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
XLPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11

EBIG.L

EBIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6
EBIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EBIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
EBIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5
EBIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
EBIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLPS.L vs. EBIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L) and Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLPS.L	EBIG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	-0.45	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	-0.51	+0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.94	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	-0.31	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.48	-0.64	+1.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLPS.L vs. EBIG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the EBIG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLPS.L and EBIG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLPS.L	EBIG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	-0.45	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	-0.30	+1.11

Drawdowns

XLPS.L vs. EBIG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLPS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, smaller than the maximum EBIG.L drawdown of -67.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPS.L and EBIG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLPS.L	EBIG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.98%	-67.33%	+43.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.32%	-27.12%	+17.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.43%	-27.12%	+14.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.06%	-35.38%	+27.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-44.91%	+41.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	13.23%	-8.81%

Volatility

XLPS.L vs. EBIG.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) at 4.97%. This indicates that XLPS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLPS.L	EBIG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	4.97%	+0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.13%	14.70%	-3.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.64%	19.15%	-5.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.25%	30.90%	-17.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.62%	30.90%	-17.28%

XLPS.L vs. EBIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLPS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EBIG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLPS.L vs. EBIG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLPS.L nor EBIG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLPS.L and EBIG.L in my portfolio?

XLPS.L and EBIG.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLPS.L or EBIG.L?

On fees, XLPS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLPS.L or EBIG.L?

XLPS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EBIG.L.

What is the main difference between XLPS.L and EBIG.L?

XLPS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Staples Index, while EBIG.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLPS.L and 0.50% for EBIG.L.