EBIG.L vs. IUCS.L
EBIG.L (Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and IUCS.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - EBIG.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while IUCS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EBIG.L returned 14.38%/yr vs 5.80%/yr for IUCS.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBIG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUCS.L.
Performance
EBIG.L vs. IUCS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EBIG.L is traded in GBP, while IUCS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUCS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EBIG.L achieves a -15.51% return, which is significantly lower than IUCS.L's 6.65% return.
EBIG.L
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- -15.51%
- 6M
- -16.48%
- 1Y
- -7.55%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUCS.L
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 4.85%
- 1Y
- 3.40%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- —
EBIG.L vs. IUCS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIG.L Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -15.51% | 9.95% | 33.02% | 24.95% | -34.59% | -36.94% |
IUCS.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 6.65% | -3.44% | 16.32% | -5.36% | 11.82% | 4.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBIG.L and IUCS.L is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between EBIG.L and IUCS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EBIG.L vs. IUCS.L — Risk / Return Rank
EBIG.L
IUCS.L
EBIG.L vs. IUCS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EBIG.L | IUCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.05 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 0.37 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 0.87 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EBIG.L | IUCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 0.23 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.50 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
EBIG.L vs. IUCS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBIG.L drawdown since its inception was -61.10%, which is greater than IUCS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBIG.L and IUCS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EBIG.L | IUCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.10% | -17.74% | -43.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.69% | -9.20% | -16.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.57% | -11.51% | -15.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.31% | -7.38% | -28.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.51% | -4.68% | -37.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.80% | 3.83% | +8.97% |
Volatility
EBIG.L vs. IUCS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (EBIG.L) is 4.14%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUCS.L) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that EBIG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUCS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EBIG.L | IUCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 6.19% | -2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.95% | 12.07% | +1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.12% | 14.63% | +3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.21% | 14.11% | +15.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.21% | 15.92% | +13.29% |
EBIG.L vs. IUCS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBIG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IUCS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EBIG.L vs. IUCS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EBIG.L nor IUCS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EBIG.L and IUCS.L have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUCS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUCS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EBIG.L.
EBIG.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while IUCS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EBIG.L and 0.15% for IUCS.L.
Find the right allocation for EBIG.L and IUCS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer