XLKQ.L vs. SPXP.L
XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L returned 27.22%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLKQ.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
XLKQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly higher than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L has outperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 27.22%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 16.32% annualized return.
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 12.27%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 21.73%
- 1Y
- 53.44%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 26.60%
- 10Y*
- 27.22%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
XLKQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 23.81% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 36.28% | 37.93% | 44.63% | 0.92% | 23.56% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKQ.L and SPXP.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2014 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XLKQ.L and SPXP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLKQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLKQ.L
SPXP.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XLKQ.L
SPXP.L
Financial Services
XLKQ.L
SPXP.L
Industrials
XLKQ.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
XLKQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Communication Services
XLKQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLKQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
XLKQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Energy
XLKQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Healthcare
XLKQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Real Estate
XLKQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Utilities
XLKQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKQ.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLKQ.L
SPXP.L
XLKQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLKQ.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.52 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 4.11 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | 15.13 | -6.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLKQ.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 2.78 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.33 | 1.10 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 1.15 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
XLKQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -28.74%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKQ.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.74% | -25.46% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -7.09% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -20.77% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | -20.77% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | -25.46% | -3.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.84% | -0.21% | -2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -3.50% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 1.93% | +4.52% |
Volatility
XLKQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that XLKQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKQ.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 2.65% | +4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.29% | 7.24% | +7.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 10.49% | +8.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 14.23% | +7.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 16.22% | +5.43% |
XLKQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLKQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLKQ.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKQ.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
XLKQ.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKQ.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer