XLKQ.L vs. ICLU.L
XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) and ICLU.L (Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while ICLU.L is a CLO fund actively managed by Invesco. XLKQ.L is passively managed, while ICLU.L is actively managed. Over the past year, XLKQ.L returned 40.78% vs 9.09% for ICLU.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLKQ.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ICLU.L.
Performance
XLKQ.L vs. ICLU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLKQ.L is traded in GBp, while ICLU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 17.69% return, which is significantly higher than ICLU.L's 4.82% return.
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 17.69%
- 6M
- 17.84%
- 1Y
- 40.78%
- 3Y*
- 31.40%
- 5Y*
- 23.86%
- 10Y*
- 26.12%
ICLU.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 4.82%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 9.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKQ.L vs. ICLU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 17.69% | 17.68% |
ICLU.L Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc | 4.82% | -4.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKQ.L and ICLU.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKQ.L vs. ICLU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLKQ.L
ICLU.L
XLKQ.L vs. ICLU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLKQ.L | ICLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 1.81 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 5.13 | +0.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLKQ.L vs. ICLU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, which is greater than ICLU.L's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and ICLU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKQ.L | ICLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.43% | -8.54% | -29.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -4.76% | -12.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | 0.00% | -7.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | -4.36% | -3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.65% | 1.68% | +4.97% |
Volatility
XLKQ.L vs. ICLU.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L) at 1.54%. This indicates that XLKQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICLU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKQ.L | ICLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 1.54% | +7.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.64% | 5.14% | +10.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.45% | 6.69% | +13.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.31% | 7.20% | +19.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 7.20% | +16.19% |
XLKQ.L vs. ICLU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ICLU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLKQ.L vs. ICLU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLKQ.L nor ICLU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKQ.L and ICLU.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ICLU.L.
XLKQ.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while ICLU.L is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKQ.L and 0.25% for ICLU.L.
Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and ICLU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer