XLKQ.L vs. COTZX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) and COTZX (Columbia Thermostat Fund) are both funds - XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while COTZX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L returned 26.55%/yr vs 7.99%/yr for COTZX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLKQ.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for COTZX.

Performance

XLKQ.L vs. COTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLKQ.L is traded in GBp, while COTZX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COTZX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 18.20% return, which is significantly higher than COTZX's 3.08% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L has outperformed COTZX with an annualized return of 26.55%, while COTZX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.99% annualized return.

XLKQ.L

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 18.20%
• 6M: 18.52%
• 1Y: 45.20%
• 3Y*: 30.77%
• 5Y*: 25.01%
• 10Y*: 26.55%

COTZX

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 3.08%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 12.15%
• 3Y*: 7.83%
• 5Y*: 5.54%
• 10Y*: 7.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLKQ.L vs. COTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	18.20%	15.76%	44.03%	51.84%	-20.58%	36.28%	37.93%	44.38%	2.54%	21.82%
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund	3.08%	6.83%	9.87%	6.08%	-2.57%	7.45%	25.80%	10.77%	4.69%	-5.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XLKQ.L and COTZX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009	0.44

The correlation between XLKQ.L and COTZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (5 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XLKQ.L vs. COTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

COTZX

COTZX Risk / Return Rank: 75
COTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
COTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
COTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
COTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
COTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLKQ.L vs. COTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLKQ.L	COTZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	1.89	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	2.71	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.36	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.50	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	7.07	-0.21

XLKQ.L vs. COTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the COTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLKQ.L and COTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLKQ.L vs. COTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, which is greater than COTZX's maximum drawdown of -27.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and COTZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLKQ.L	COTZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.43%	-27.58%	-10.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.76%	-4.79%	-11.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.74%	-12.16%	-16.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.74%	-12.16%	-16.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.74%	-13.12%	-15.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.23%	-0.67%	-6.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.07%	-3.64%	-4.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.57%	1.69%	+4.88%

Volatility

XLKQ.L vs. COTZX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) at 1.92%. This indicates that XLKQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLKQ.L	COTZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.58%	1.92%	+6.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.29%	4.81%	+10.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.96%	6.33%	+13.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.22%	8.69%	+17.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.42%	9.97%	+13.45%

XLKQ.L vs. COTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than COTZX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLKQ.L vs. COTZX - Dividend Comparison

XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund	3.28%	3.37%	3.55%	2.74%	3.28%	14.82%	6.92%	5.57%	4.45%	3.13%	2.66%	4.26%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLKQ.L and COTZX in my portfolio?

XLKQ.L and COTZX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.