XLK vs. ZTIP.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and ZTIP.TO (BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while ZTIP.TO is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 0-5 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLK returned 22.02%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for ZTIP.TO. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for ZTIP.TO.

Performance

XLK vs. ZTIP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLK is traded in USD, while ZTIP.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZTIP.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than ZTIP.TO's 1.43% return.

XLK

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 28.96%
• 1Y: 55.42%
• 3Y*: 30.28%
• 5Y*: 22.02%
• 10Y*: 25.19%

ZTIP.TO

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 4.31%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. ZTIP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	28.52%	24.61%	21.63%	56.02%	-27.73%	30.80%
ZTIP.TO BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF	1.53%	5.95%	4.95%	4.41%	-2.24%	4.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and ZTIP.TO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2021	-0.10

Return for Risk

XLK vs. ZTIP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 76
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 68

ZTIP.TO

ZTIP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 47
ZTIP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
ZTIP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ZTIP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ZTIP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
ZTIP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. ZTIP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLK	ZTIP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	0.75	+1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	1.15	+1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.14	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	2.48	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	7.40	+3.45

XLK vs. ZTIP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the ZTIP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and ZTIP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLK vs. ZTIP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than ZTIP.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and ZTIP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLK	ZTIP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.05%	-6.85%	-75.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.92%	-1.75%	-14.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.66%	-2.38%	-23.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.56%	-6.85%	-26.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.77%	-0.78%	-5.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.93%	-1.58%	-33.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.92%	0.58%	+4.34%

Volatility

XLK vs. ZTIP.TO - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO) at 1.06%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTIP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLK	ZTIP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.86%	1.06%	+9.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.92%	3.94%	+14.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.55%	5.79%	+16.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.18%	7.81%	+17.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.64%	7.78%	+16.86%

XLK vs. ZTIP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTIP.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLK vs. ZTIP.TO - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than ZTIP.TO's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.41%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%
ZTIP.TO BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF	3.42%	3.63%	3.63%	4.91%	4.93%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLK and ZTIP.TO in my portfolio?

XLK and ZTIP.TO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLK or ZTIP.TO?

On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLK or ZTIP.TO?

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ZTIP.TO.

What is the main difference between XLK and ZTIP.TO?

XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while ZTIP.TO is Inflation-Protected Bonds. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while ZTIP.TO tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 0-5 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.17% for ZTIP.TO.