XLK vs. XT
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.48%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
XLK vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.25% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed XT with an annualized return of 25.48%, while XT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.88% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 28.25%
- 6M
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 52.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.34%
- 10Y*
- 25.48%
XT
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 37.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.88%
XLK vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.25% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 15.73% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 30.74% | -4.93% | 33.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and XT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015 | 0.85 |
The correlation between XLK and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLK vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
XT
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XLK
XT
Energy
XLK
XT
Industrials
XLK
XT
Basic Materials
XLK
-
XT
Communication Services
XLK
-
XT
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
XT
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
XT
Financial Services
XLK
-
XT
Healthcare
XLK
-
XT
Real Estate
XLK
-
XT
Utilities
XLK
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
XT
XLK vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.38 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 3.63 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.56 | 14.43 | -3.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -34.41% | -47.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -10.45% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -22.09% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -34.41% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -34.41% | +0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -4.18% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.90% | -7.39% | -27.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 2.62% | +2.36% |
Volatility
XLK vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 12.51% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 8.14%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.51% | 8.14% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.70% | 13.78% | +5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.48% | 17.32% | +6.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 21.00% | +4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.71% | 20.12% | +4.59% |
XLK vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLK vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than XT's 7.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 7.08% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and XT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to XT (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.48% vs 14.88% for XT. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 8.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.48% return vs 14.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 0.43% for XLK.
XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.46% for XT.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer