XLK vs. XSP.TO
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XSP.TO (iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XSP.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.19%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for XSP.TO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XSP.TO.
Performance
XLK vs. XSP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLK is traded in USD, while XSP.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XSP.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than XSP.TO's 5.60% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed XSP.TO with an annualized return of 25.19%, while XSP.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.43% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
XSP.TO
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 19.70%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
XLK vs. XSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
XSP.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 5.60% | 21.22% | 13.76% | 27.36% | -24.13% | 24.33% | 17.96% | 34.93% | -13.52% | 29.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and XSP.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XLK and XSP.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLK vs. XSP.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
XSP.TO
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XLK
XSP.TO
Energy
XLK
XSP.TO
Industrials
XLK
XSP.TO
Basic Materials
XLK
-
XSP.TO
Communication Services
XLK
-
XSP.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
XSP.TO
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
XSP.TO
Financial Services
XLK
-
XSP.TO
Healthcare
XLK
-
XSP.TO
Real Estate
XLK
-
XSP.TO
Utilities
XLK
-
XSP.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. XSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
XSP.TO
XLK vs. XSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | XSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.25 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 1.63 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 6.95 | +3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. XSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than XSP.TO's maximum drawdown of -69.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and XSP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | XSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -69.22% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -11.63% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -19.45% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -33.34% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -41.38% | +7.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -3.55% | -3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -13.14% | -21.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 2.72% | +2.20% |
Volatility
XLK vs. XSP.TO - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XSP.TO) at 4.62%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | XSP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 4.62% | +6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.92% | 10.33% | +8.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 13.32% | +9.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 18.01% | +7.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 19.50% | +5.14% |
XLK vs. XSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLK vs. XSP.TO - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than XSP.TO's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
XSP.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.09% | 1.18% | 1.37% | 1.01% | 1.31% | 1.73% | 1.86% | 1.45% | 1.76% | 1.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and XSP.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XSP.TO.
XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XSP.TO is S&P 500. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.09% for XSP.TO.
Find the right allocation for XLK and XSP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer