PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. XGD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. XGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLK is traded in USD, while XGD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XGD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than XGD.TO's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed XGD.TO with an annualized return of 25.19%, while XGD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.24% annualized return.


XLK

1D
0.87%
1M
2.95%
YTD
28.52%
6M
28.96%
1Y
55.42%
3Y*
30.28%
5Y*
22.02%
10Y*
25.19%

XGD.TO

1D
2.80%
1M
-14.79%
YTD
-4.15%
6M
-2.94%
1Y
52.19%
3Y*
39.77%
5Y*
17.63%
10Y*
13.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. XGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.52%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
-4.15%156.14%10.29%6.44%-8.90%-5.76%24.05%46.20%-11.54%8.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and XGD.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.14

The correlation between XLK and XGD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (10 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. XGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XGD.TO
XGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. XGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKXGD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.24

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.63

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.85

4.62

+6.23

XLK vs. XGD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and XGD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLK vs. XGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, roughly equal to the maximum XGD.TO drawdown of -80.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and XGD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKXGD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-80.30%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-34.40%

+18.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-34.40%

+8.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-44.90%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

-47.12%

+13.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-29.14%

+22.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.93%

-40.83%

+5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

12.14%

-7.22%

Volatility

XLK vs. XGD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is 10.86%, while iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) has a volatility of 16.18%. This indicates that XLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKXGD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.86%

16.18%

-5.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.92%

36.18%

-17.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

44.62%

-22.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.18%

33.65%

-8.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.64%

34.19%

-9.55%

XLK vs. XGD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XGD.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLK vs. XGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than XGD.TO's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF
0.64%0.62%0.93%1.49%1.77%1.38%0.35%0.54%0.25%0.14%0.10%0.57%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.41%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLK and XGD.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XGD.TO.

XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XGD.TO is Gold. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XGD.TO tracks S&P/TSX Global Gold Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.61% for XGD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and XGD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer