XLK vs. TMUS
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.19%/yr vs 16.66%/yr for TMUS. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLK vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's -5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed TMUS with an annualized return of 25.19%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively lower 16.66% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
TMUS
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.66%
XLK vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -5.91% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and TMUS is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.38 |
The correlation between XLK and TMUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
TMUS
XLK vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.91 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | -0.52 | +3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | -0.88 | +11.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, roughly equal to the maximum TMUS drawdown of -86.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and TMUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -86.29% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -30.37% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -33.65% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -33.65% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -33.65% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -29.12% | +22.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -25.96% | -8.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 17.87% | -12.95% |
Volatility
XLK vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) at 7.72%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 7.72% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.92% | 19.08% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 24.99% | -2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 23.90% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 26.08% | -1.44% |
Dividends
XLK vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than TMUS's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.08% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and TMUS have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to TMUS (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs TMUS's -86.29%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and TMUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer