XLK vs. FTXL
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLK returned 21.34%/yr vs 33.38%/yr for FTXL. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
XLK vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.25% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 111.02% return.
XLK
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 28.25%
- 6M
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 52.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.34%
- 10Y*
- 25.48%
FTXL
- 1D
- -7.99%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 111.02%
- 6M
- 108.37%
- 1Y
- 198.66%
- 3Y*
- 59.97%
- 5Y*
- 33.38%
- 10Y*
- —
XLK vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.25% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 111.02% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 46.08% | 61.77% | -14.47% | 32.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and FTXL is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between XLK and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLK vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
FTXL
Technology
Energy
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XLK
FTXL
Energy
XLK
FTXL
-
Industrials
XLK
FTXL
Basic Materials
XLK
-
FTXL
-
Communication Services
XLK
-
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
FTXL
-
Financial Services
XLK
-
FTXL
-
Healthcare
XLK
-
FTXL
-
Real Estate
XLK
-
FTXL
-
Utilities
XLK
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
FTXL
XLK vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.63 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 13.78 | -10.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.56 | 47.69 | -37.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than FTXL's maximum drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -43.87% | -38.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -14.51% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -41.57% | +15.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -43.87% | +10.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -7.99% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.90% | -10.53% | -24.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 4.18% | +0.80% |
Volatility
XLK vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is 12.51%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 22.71%. This indicates that XLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.51% | 22.71% | -10.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.70% | 34.66% | -14.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.48% | 40.91% | -17.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 37.11% | -11.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.71% | 34.77% | -10.06% |
XLK vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLK vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, more than FTXL's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and FTXL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (22.71%) compared to XLK (12.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 33.38% vs 21.34% for XLK. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 12.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 33.38% return vs 21.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.13% for FTXL.
XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.89 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer