XLK vs. CGL.TO
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and CGL.TO (iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while CGL.TO is a Gold fund tracking the Gold Bullion. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.19%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for CGL.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CGL.TO.
Performance
XLK vs. CGL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLK is traded in USD, while CGL.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CGL.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than CGL.TO's -5.12% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed CGL.TO with an annualized return of 25.19%, while CGL.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.05% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
CGL.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -11.35%
- YTD
- -5.12%
- 6M
- -4.61%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 25.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
XLK vs. CGL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
CGL.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -5.12% | 67.73% | 15.88% | 13.97% | -6.96% | -4.54% | 26.41% | 21.59% | -10.70% | 19.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and CGL.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2010 | 0.03 |
The correlation between XLK and CGL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. CGL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
CGL.TO
XLK vs. CGL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.14 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 0.70 | +2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 2.00 | +8.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. CGL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than CGL.TO's maximum drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and CGL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -62.05% | -20.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -27.17% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -27.17% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -27.17% | -6.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -27.17% | -6.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -24.91% | +18.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -32.74% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 9.43% | -4.51% |
Volatility
XLK vs. CGL.TO - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) at 7.69%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 7.69% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.92% | 24.50% | -5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 28.25% | -5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 19.70% | +5.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 17.92% | +6.72% |
XLK vs. CGL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CGL.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLK vs. CGL.TO - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, while CGL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGL.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and CGL.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CGL.TO.
XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while CGL.TO is Gold. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while CGL.TO tracks Gold Bullion. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.55% for CGL.TO.
Find the right allocation for XLK and CGL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer