PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. AIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLK having a 36.47% return and AIQ slightly lower at 35.98%.


XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%

AIQ

1D
-1.40%
1M
21.10%
YTD
35.98%
6M
36.15%
1Y
69.19%
3Y*
37.50%
5Y*
19.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-9.84%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
35.98%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%17.09%52.88%39.94%-14.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and AIQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.90

The correlation between XLK and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLK vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLK
AIQ

Technology

99.7%
73.3%

Energy

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.1%
4.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.4%

Healthcare

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XLK
99.7%
AIQ
73.3%

Energy

XLK
0.2%
AIQ

-

Industrials

XLK
0.1%
AIQ
4.2%

Basic Materials

XLK

-

AIQ

-

Communication Services

XLK

-

AIQ
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XLK

-

AIQ
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

XLK

-

AIQ

-

Financial Services

XLK

-

AIQ
0.4%

Healthcare

XLK

-

AIQ
0.4%

Real Estate

XLK

-

AIQ

-

Utilities

XLK

-

AIQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLKAIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.49

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.22

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.16

14.59

-0.43

XLK vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is comparable to the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLKAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

3.02

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.76

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.84

-0.42

Drawdowns

XLK vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and AIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-44.66%

-37.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-16.47%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-26.35%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-44.66%

+11.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-1.40%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-9.80%

-25.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

4.76%

-0.02%

Volatility

XLK vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is 6.98%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that XLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKAIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.98%

8.60%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.68%

18.46%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.82%

23.04%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.90%

25.33%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.49%

25.50%

-1.01%

XLK vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLK vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.14%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, XLK and AIQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AIQ has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 23.83% vs 19.07% for AIQ. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.83% return vs 19.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.

XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.68% for AIQ.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and AIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer