XLIS.L vs. XSPR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLIS.L (Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and XSPR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both Industrials Equities funds - XLIS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index while XSPR.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLIS.L returned 13.28%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for XSPR.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLIS.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XSPR.L.

Performance

XLIS.L vs. XSPR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSPR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLIS.L is traded in USD, while XSPR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSPR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLIS.L achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly higher than XSPR.L's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, XLIS.L has outperformed XSPR.L with an annualized return of 13.28%, while XSPR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.39% annualized return.

XLIS.L

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 12.54%
• 6M: 13.72%
• 1Y: 23.15%
• 3Y*: 21.93%
• 5Y*: 12.19%
• 10Y*: 13.28%

XSPR.L

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 5.67%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 11.08%
• 1Y: 10.08%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 3.07%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLIS.L vs. XSPR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLIS.L Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	12.54%	19.35%	17.30%	17.93%	-5.18%	20.54%	9.91%	28.73%	-14.24%	20.32%
XSPR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	7.76%	22.21%	-7.84%	23.63%	-17.81%	17.16%	24.45%	18.35%	-15.88%	37.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XLIS.L and XSPR.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2011	0.43

The correlation between XLIS.L and XSPR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLIS.L vs. XSPR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLIS.L	XSPR.L
Industrials	96.3%	-
Technology	1.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.3%	1.3%
Real Estate	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	98.7%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLIS.L vs. XSPR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLIS.L

XLIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 47
XLIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
XLIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XLIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
XLIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
XLIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 51

XSPR.L

XSPR.L Risk / Return Rank: 17
XSPR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
XSPR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XSPR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XSPR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
XSPR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLIS.L vs. XSPR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSPR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLIS.L	XSPR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	0.36	+1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	0.71	+1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.11	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	0.54	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.44	1.13	+7.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLIS.L vs. XSPR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLIS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the XSPR.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLIS.L and XSPR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLIS.L	XSPR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	0.36	+1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.15	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.55	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.06	+0.60

Drawdowns

XLIS.L vs. XSPR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLIS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.30%, smaller than the maximum XSPR.L drawdown of -72.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIS.L and XSPR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLIS.L	XSPR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.30%	-72.47%	+30.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.65%	-18.60%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.65%	-18.61%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.21%	-39.96%	+18.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.30%	-49.87%	+7.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-4.06%	+3.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-27.63%	+22.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	8.86%	-6.12%

Volatility

XLIS.L vs. XSPR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) is 4.85%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSPR.L) has a volatility of 7.10%. This indicates that XLIS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSPR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLIS.L	XSPR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	7.10%	-2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.77%	15.74%	-3.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.58%	27.65%	-13.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.35%	28.00%	-10.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.12%	31.71%	-12.59%

XLIS.L vs. XSPR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLIS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XSPR.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLIS.L vs. XSPR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLIS.L nor XSPR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLIS.L and XSPR.L in my portfolio?

XLIS.L and XSPR.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLIS.L or XSPR.L?

On fees, XLIS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLIS.L or XSPR.L?

XLIS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSPR.L.

What is the main difference between XLIS.L and XSPR.L?

XLIS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index, while XSPR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLIS.L and 0.20% for XSPR.L.