XLIP.L vs. SPXP.L
XLIP.L (Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLIP.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLIP.L returned 14.13%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLIP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
XLIP.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLIP.L achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly higher than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XLIP.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 14.13%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.
XLIP.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 13.06%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
XLIP.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.73% | 11.11% | 19.28% | 11.56% | 6.12% | 22.08% | 6.17% | 24.82% | -9.41% | 9.57% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLIP.L and SPXP.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.70 |
The correlation between XLIP.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLIP.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLIP.L
SPXP.L
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XLIP.L
SPXP.L
Technology
XLIP.L
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLIP.L
SPXP.L
Real Estate
XLIP.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
XLIP.L
-
SPXP.L
Communication Services
XLIP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
XLIP.L
-
SPXP.L
Energy
XLIP.L
-
SPXP.L
Financial Services
XLIP.L
-
SPXP.L
Healthcare
XLIP.L
-
SPXP.L
Utilities
XLIP.L
-
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLIP.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLIP.L
SPXP.L
XLIP.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLIP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.52 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 4.11 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 15.13 | -6.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLIP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.78 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 1.06 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 1.10 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.15 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
XLIP.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIP.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLIP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.56% | -25.46% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -7.09% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.02% | -20.77% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.02% | -20.77% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.56% | -25.46% | -9.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.21% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -3.50% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 1.93% | +1.01% |
Volatility
XLIP.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that XLIP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLIP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 2.65% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 7.24% | +3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 10.49% | +2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 14.23% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 16.22% | +2.10% |
XLIP.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLIP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLIP.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLIP.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLIP.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLIP.L.
XLIP.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. XLIP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLIP.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for XLIP.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer