PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLI vs. FRDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLI vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly lower than FRDM's 33.53% return.


XLI

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.25%
YTD
12.25%
6M
13.16%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
13.86%

FRDM

1D
2.14%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
33.53%
6M
40.61%
1Y
79.74%
3Y*
32.52%
5Y*
17.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLI vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
12.25%19.35%17.31%18.13%-5.57%21.08%10.91%12.09%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
33.53%61.27%1.70%22.77%-14.45%6.13%16.90%12.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XLI and FRDM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019

0.58

The correlation between XLI and FRDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLI vs. FRDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLI
FRDM

Industrials

90.7%
8.6%

Utilities

4.8%
2.6%

Technology

4.0%
41.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
7.8%

Basic Materials

-

7.4%

Communication Services

-

3.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.2%

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

22.1%

Healthcare

-

1.8%

Real Estate

-

2.5%

Industrials

XLI
90.7%
FRDM
8.6%

Utilities

XLI
4.8%
FRDM
2.6%

Technology

XLI
4.0%
FRDM
41.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XLI
0.5%
FRDM
7.8%

Basic Materials

XLI

-

FRDM
7.4%

Communication Services

XLI

-

FRDM
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

XLI

-

FRDM
2.2%

Energy

XLI

-

FRDM
0.1%

Financial Services

XLI

-

FRDM
22.1%

Healthcare

XLI

-

FRDM
1.8%

Real Estate

XLI

-

FRDM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLI vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLI
XLI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDM
FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLI vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLIFRDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.53

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

4.75

-2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

18.69

-11.72

XLI vs. FRDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLI Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the FRDM Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLI and FRDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLIFRDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

3.08

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.84

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.79

-0.33

Drawdowns

XLI vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, which is greater than FRDM's maximum drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and FRDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLIFRDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.26%

-40.49%

-21.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-16.87%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-16.87%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-29.25%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-8.86%

+6.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-7.10%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

4.28%

-1.20%

Volatility

XLI vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) is 3.98%, while Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a volatility of 13.53%. This indicates that XLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLIFRDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

13.53%

-9.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.84%

23.53%

-10.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

26.09%

-10.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

21.15%

-3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

22.98%

-2.99%

XLI vs. FRDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDM's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLI vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison

XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than FRDM's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
1.64%2.26%2.53%2.66%2.72%2.17%1.11%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.18%1.29%1.44%1.63%1.63%1.25%1.55%1.94%2.15%1.77%2.07%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLI and FRDM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRDM has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to XLI (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs FRDM's -40.49%.

On 5-year performance, FRDM leads with 17.60% vs 12.54% for XLI. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLI has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FRDM has performed better with a 17.60% return vs 12.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRDM.

FRDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.18% for XLI.

XLI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while FRDM is Emerging Markets Diversified. XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index, while FRDM tracks Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Freedom Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLI and 0.49% for FRDM.

FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLI and FRDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer