XLFQ.L vs. XS7R.L
XLFQ.L (Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF) and XS7R.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from Invesco and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLFQ.L returned 13.02%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for XS7R.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLFQ.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XS7R.L.
Performance
XLFQ.L vs. XS7R.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLFQ.L achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than XS7R.L's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XLFQ.L has outperformed XS7R.L with an annualized return of 13.02%, while XS7R.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.57% annualized return.
XLFQ.L
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -2.62%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.02%
XS7R.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
XLFQ.L vs. XS7R.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLFQ.L Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF | -4.71% | 7.07% | 32.15% | 6.12% | -0.39% | 37.90% | -6.56% | 27.16% | -9.51% | 11.87% |
XS7R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 2.58% | 47.44% | 18.33% | 20.38% | 3.19% | 27.29% | -19.81% | 7.94% | -24.58% | 16.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLFQ.L and XS7R.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2013 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XLFQ.L and XS7R.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLFQ.L vs. XS7R.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLFQ.L
XS7R.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLFQ.L
XS7R.L
Technology
XLFQ.L
XS7R.L
Industrials
XLFQ.L
XS7R.L
Basic Materials
XLFQ.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Communication Services
XLFQ.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLFQ.L
-
XS7R.L
Consumer Defensive
XLFQ.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Energy
XLFQ.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Healthcare
XLFQ.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Real Estate
XLFQ.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Utilities
XLFQ.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLFQ.L vs. XS7R.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLFQ.L
XS7R.L
XLFQ.L vs. XS7R.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLFQ.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.24 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 1.93 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 6.59 | -5.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLFQ.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 1.35 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.99 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.49 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.10 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
XLFQ.L vs. XS7R.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum XS7R.L drawdown of -66.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLFQ.L and XS7R.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLFQ.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -66.04% | +30.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.81% | -11.33% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -15.17% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.01% | -23.60% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.39% | -55.42% | +20.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.62% | -2.39% | -4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -26.41% | +20.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 3.32% | +2.16% |
Volatility
XLFQ.L vs. XS7R.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) is 4.46%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that XLFQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS7R.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLFQ.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 5.07% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 13.42% | -2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 16.25% | -2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 18.86% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 22.52% | -2.38% |
XLFQ.L vs. XS7R.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLFQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XS7R.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLFQ.L vs. XS7R.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLFQ.L nor XS7R.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLFQ.L and XS7R.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLFQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLFQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS7R.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLFQ.L and 0.20% for XS7R.L.
Find the right allocation for XLFQ.L and XS7R.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer