XLEP.L vs. SPXP.L
XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLEP.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLEP.L returned 10.15%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLEP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
XLEP.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLEP.L achieves a 31.41% return, which is significantly higher than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XLEP.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 10.15%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.
XLEP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 6M
- 28.36%
- 1Y
- 47.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
XLEP.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 31.41% | 1.41% | 4.85% | -5.07% | 81.43% | 53.83% | -35.01% | 5.84% | -13.66% | -9.87% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLEP.L and SPXP.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.40 |
The correlation between XLEP.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLEP.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLEP.L
SPXP.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLEP.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
XLEP.L
-
SPXP.L
Communication Services
XLEP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLEP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
XLEP.L
-
SPXP.L
Financial Services
XLEP.L
-
SPXP.L
Healthcare
XLEP.L
-
SPXP.L
Industrials
XLEP.L
-
SPXP.L
Real Estate
XLEP.L
-
SPXP.L
Technology
XLEP.L
-
SPXP.L
Utilities
XLEP.L
-
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLEP.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLEP.L
SPXP.L
XLEP.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLEP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.52 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 4.11 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 15.13 | -5.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLEP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.78 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 1.06 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 1.10 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.15 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
XLEP.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLEP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEP.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLEP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -25.46% | -37.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -7.09% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.06% | -20.77% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.16% | -20.77% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.35% | -25.46% | -37.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -0.21% | -7.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -3.50% | -13.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 1.93% | +3.17% |
Volatility
XLEP.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that XLEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLEP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 2.65% | +6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.87% | 7.24% | +12.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.44% | 10.49% | +12.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 14.23% | +12.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.14% | 16.22% | +11.92% |
XLEP.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLEP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLEP.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLEP.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLEP.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLEP.L.
XLEP.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. XLEP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLEP.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for XLEP.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer