XLCP.L vs. 3IN.L
XLCP.L (Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A) is Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while 3IN.L (3I Infrastructure plc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, XLCP.L returned 9.26%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for 3IN.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLCP.L vs. 3IN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLCP.L achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than 3IN.L's -0.67% return.
XLCP.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -2.31%
- 1Y
- 7.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- —
3IN.L
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
XLCP.L vs. 3IN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLCP.L Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A | -1.61% | 11.11% | 40.05% | 43.94% | -32.63% | 15.05% | 17.17% | 27.75% | -8.58% |
3IN.L 3I Infrastructure plc | -0.67% | 22.18% | 2.54% | -0.26% | -2.67% | 18.80% | 8.07% | 17.48% | 7.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLCP.L and 3IN.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2018 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLCP.L vs. 3IN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLCP.L
3IN.L
XLCP.L vs. 3IN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A (XLCP.L) and 3I Infrastructure plc (3IN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLCP.L | 3IN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.17 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 0.98 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 2.83 | -0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLCP.L | 3IN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 0.91 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.42 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.57 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
XLCP.L vs. 3IN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLCP.L drawdown since its inception was -38.47%, smaller than the maximum 3IN.L drawdown of -41.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCP.L and 3IN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLCP.L | 3IN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.47% | -41.42% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | -15.32% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.92% | -15.32% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.47% | -20.10% | -18.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.41% | -3.51% | -1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.48% | -4.48% | -4.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 5.30% | -1.99% |
Volatility
XLCP.L vs. 3IN.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A (XLCP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to 3I Infrastructure plc (3IN.L) at 4.12%. This indicates that XLCP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3IN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLCP.L | 3IN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 4.12% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 12.24% | -2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 16.47% | -3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 17.94% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 21.23% | -2.64% |
Dividends
XLCP.L vs. 3IN.L - Dividend Comparison
XLCP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 3IN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3IN.L 3I Infrastructure plc | 3.51% | 3.49% | 3.87% | 3.58% | 3.23% | 2.86% | 3.08% | 3.03% | 15.84% | 3.70% | 3.96% | 13.36% |
XLCP.L Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLCP.L and 3IN.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XLCP.L and 3IN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer