3IN.L vs. BN

In the year-to-date period, 3IN.L achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly higher than BN's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, 3IN.L has underperformed BN with an annualized return of 9.21%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3I Infrastructure plc (3IN.L) and Brookfield Corp (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current 3IN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the BN Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3IN.L and BN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

3IN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than BN's 0.59% yield.

The maximum 3IN.L drawdown since its inception was -41.42%, smaller than the maximum BN drawdown of -72.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3IN.L and BN.

3I Infrastructure plc (3IN.L) and Brookfield Corp (BN) have volatilities of 5.27% and 5.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3I Infrastructure plc and Brookfield Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.