PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLCI vs. DRLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLCI vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLCI achieves a -1.17% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 28.37% return.


XLCI

1D
-1.18%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
-1.17%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRLL

1D
-1.78%
1M
0.69%
YTD
28.37%
6M
24.85%
1Y
43.29%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLCI vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLCI and DRLL is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

-0.07

XLCI vs. DRLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLCI
DRLL

Financial Services

99.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

99.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLCI
99.7%
DRLL

-

Basic Materials

XLCI

-

DRLL

-

Communication Services

XLCI

-

DRLL

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLCI

-

DRLL
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

XLCI

-

DRLL

-

Energy

XLCI

-

DRLL
99.1%

Healthcare

XLCI

-

DRLL

-

Industrials

XLCI

-

DRLL

-

Real Estate

XLCI

-

DRLL

-

Technology

XLCI

-

DRLL

-

Utilities

XLCI

-

DRLL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLCI vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLCI

DRLL
DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLCI vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLCI vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLCIDRLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.54

+0.07

Drawdowns

XLCI vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLCI drawdown since its inception was -7.72%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCI and DRLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCIDRLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-23.73%

+16.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-10.12%

+5.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-8.02%

+6.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

Volatility

XLCI vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLCIDRLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

22.29%

-11.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.88%

23.76%

-12.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.88%

23.76%

-12.88%

XLCI vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLCI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLCI vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

XLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.08%, more than DRLL's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
2.39%2.99%3.00%3.01%1.18%
XLCI
State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
10.08%5.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLCI and DRLL have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLCI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLCI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.

XLCI has the higher dividend yield at 10.08%, compared with 2.39% for DRLL.

XLCI is categorized as Derivative Income, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLCI and 0.41% for DRLL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLCI and DRLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer