XLCI vs. ACLO
XLCI (State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLCI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. XLCI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.
Performance
XLCI vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLCI achieves a -2.03% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 2.54% return.
XLCI
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -2.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLCI vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -2.03% | 6.73% |
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.54% | 2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLCI and ACLO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLCI vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank
XLCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACLO
XLCI vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLCI | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 3.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 19.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 162.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLCI vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLCI drawdown since its inception was -8.44%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCI and ACLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLCI | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -1.01% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -0.03% | -4.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -0.04% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
XLCI vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLCI | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 0.73% | +10.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.48% | 1.06% | +10.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.48% | 1.06% | +10.42% |
XLCI vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLCI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLCI vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison
XLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%, more than ACLO's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.91% | 4.87% | 0.59% |
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.66% | 5.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLCI and ACLO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLCI.
XLCI has the higher dividend yield at 11.66%, compared with 4.91% for ACLO.
XLCI is categorized as Derivative Income, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: State Street and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLCI and 0.20% for ACLO.
Find the right allocation for XLCI and ACLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer