XLBI vs. OMAH
XLBI (State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLBI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
XLBI vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLBI achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 7.20% return.
XLBI
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 10.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.94M | $16.88M | $15.65M | |
| $113.99K | $122.71K | $145.29K |
XLBI vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.64% | 2.25% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 7.20% | 3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLBI and OMAH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.42 |
XLBI vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLBI
OMAH
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLBI
OMAH
Basic Materials
XLBI
-
OMAH
-
Communication Services
XLBI
-
OMAH
Consumer Cyclical
XLBI
-
OMAH
Consumer Defensive
XLBI
-
OMAH
Energy
XLBI
-
OMAH
Healthcare
XLBI
-
OMAH
Industrials
XLBI
-
OMAH
Real Estate
XLBI
-
OMAH
-
Technology
XLBI
-
OMAH
Utilities
XLBI
-
OMAH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLBI vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
XLBI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OMAH
XLBI vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLBI | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLBI vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLBI drawdown since its inception was -10.62%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBI and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLBI | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -11.83% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -2.72% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -1.24% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.29% | — |
Volatility
XLBI vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLBI | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.81% | 8.27% | +5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 12.86% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 12.86% | +0.95% |
XLBI vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLBI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLBI vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
XLBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.00%, less than OMAH's 15.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.22% | 12.86% |
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 15.00% | 7.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLBI and OMAH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.22%, compared with 15.00% for XLBI.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLBI and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for XLBI and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer