PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLB.TO vs. XSH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLB.TO vs. XSH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLB.TO achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than XSH.TO's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, XLB.TO has underperformed XSH.TO with an annualized return of 0.35%, while XSH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.81% annualized return.


XLB.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.71%
6M
-0.43%
YTD
0.64%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
2.26%
5Y*
-2.60%
10Y*
0.35%

XSH.TO

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.07%
6M
1.08%
YTD
1.40%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*
2.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLB.TO vs. XSH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
0.64%-0.76%0.71%9.15%-21.64%-4.59%11.18%12.85%-0.25%7.11%
XSH.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.40%4.61%7.11%6.80%-4.52%-0.81%6.28%5.02%1.28%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XLB.TO and XSH.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2011

0.53

The correlation between XLB.TO and XSH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLB.TO vs. XSH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLB.TO
XLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

XSH.TO
XSH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XSH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLB.TO vs. XSH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLB.TOXSH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.36

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.61

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.91

10.31

-8.40

XLB.TO vs. XSH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the XSH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLB.TO and XSH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLB.TO vs. XSH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.97%, which is greater than XSH.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB.TO and XSH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLB.TOXSH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.97%

-14.24%

-18.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.85%

-1.51%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.53%

-1.51%

-9.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.81%

-7.80%

-20.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.97%

-14.24%

-18.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.11%

-0.31%

-19.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-0.92%

-6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

0.38%

+1.95%

Volatility

XLB.TO vs. XSH.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH.TO) at 0.57%. This indicates that XLB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLB.TOXSH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

0.57%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.88%

1.83%

+4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.82%

2.19%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.35%

2.84%

+9.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.65%

4.42%

+7.23%

XLB.TO vs. XSH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLB.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XSH.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLB.TO vs. XSH.TO - Dividend Comparison

XLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than XSH.TO's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
4.10%4.05%3.82%3.73%3.97%3.03%2.90%3.18%3.56%3.45%3.62%3.64%
XSH.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.91%3.82%3.64%3.24%2.97%2.65%2.61%2.80%2.86%2.93%3.08%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLB.TO and XSH.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSH.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSH.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLB.TO.

XLB.TO tracks Morningstar Can 10+Y Core Bd GR CAD, while XSH.TO tracks Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLB.TO and 0.10% for XSH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLB.TO and XSH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer