PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJSE.DE vs. XBO2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJSE.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Japan Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XJSE.DE) and Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJSE.DE achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than XBO2.DE's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, XJSE.DE has underperformed XBO2.DE with an annualized return of -7.08%, while XBO2.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.71% annualized return.


XJSE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.85%
6M
-4.72%
YTD
-5.80%
1Y
-13.84%
3Y*
-11.74%
5Y*
-11.57%
10Y*
-7.08%

XBO2.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
6M
0.86%
YTD
0.65%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
2.81%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*
0.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJSE.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XJSE.DE
Xtrackers II Japan Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
-5.80%-17.53%-8.95%-9.72%-14.55%-3.16%-4.65%5.55%7.74%-8.68%
XBO2.DE
Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.65%2.42%3.53%3.03%-0.64%-0.60%-0.22%0.03%-0.47%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XJSE.DE and XBO2.DE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2013

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJSE.DE vs. XBO2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJSE.DE
XJSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
XJSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
XJSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

XBO2.DE
XBO2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XBO2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJSE.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Japan Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XJSE.DE) and Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XJSE.DEXBO2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.19

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

1.54

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

4.21

-5.56

XJSE.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJSE.DE Sharpe Ratio is -1.48, which is lower than the XBO2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJSE.DE and XBO2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XJSE.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than XBO2.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJSE.DE and XBO2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJSE.DEXBO2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-3.92%

-51.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.11%

-1.12%

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.71%

-1.12%

-31.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.64%

-1.31%

-46.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.16%

-3.77%

-50.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.83%

-0.58%

-54.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.34%

-0.71%

-19.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.25%

0.41%

+9.84%

Volatility

XJSE.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Japan Government Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XJSE.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE) at 1.48%. This indicates that XJSE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBO2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJSE.DEXBO2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

1.48%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

2.61%

+4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.30%

3.29%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.15%

1.53%

+9.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.88%

1.64%

+8.24%

XJSE.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XJSE.DE and XBO2.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XJSE.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XJSE.DE nor XBO2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XJSE.DE and XBO2.DE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XJSE.DE and XBO2.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

XJSE.DE tracks FTSE Japanese Government Bond Index, while XBO2.DE tracks FTSE Eurozone BOT Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJSE.DE and XBO2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer